Wednesday, February 24, 2010

sustainable venues

So one thing I'm impressed with is how VANOC built all new buidings and improved existing buildings used for the Games in accordance with Leadership and Environmental Design (LEED) green building ratings system.

A full list of the buildings can be found at :
http://www.vancouver2010.com/more-2010-information/sustainability/sustainable-venues/

There were a ton of changes and improvements made to all buildings and sites used for the Games, but I wanted to post a few of the changes I read that I thought were cool...

The Richmond Olympic Oval has a BC Pine-Beetle wood roof. It's made from BC wood that's been destroyed by the Pine Beetle infestation. VANOC targeted LEED "Silver" green building certification for this facility.

http://www.venueenergytracker.com/

This is an image showing the amount of electricity used for the Richmond Olympic Oval during a 1 week period during the games. The blue curve shows the original electrical consumption amounts (total would've been 1,299 kW), while the green curve shows what the amount of consumption would have been had they not involved sustainable practices (total actually was 1,104kW). I think this is pretty cool...

Many of the buildings including the Vancouver Olympic Centre, are re-using rainwater. It is collected and re-used for flushing water efficient toilets, and reducing the amount of potable water used at this venue. VANOC targeted LEED "Gold" green building certification for this facility.

The Whistler Creekside had a Wildlife Management plan prior to the building of the area where alpine skiing events would be taking place; avoiding and minimizing harming wildlife, aquatic, and terrestrial habitats. For example, a tailed frog management plan was implemented during construction which meant relocating hundreds of tadpoles and adult frogs to protect them from potential construction impacts.

The Whistler Sliding Centre where the bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton competitions take place has been made to be Energy Efficient. By using trees throughout the site to cast shade, a weather protection and shading system that covers most the track, and by painting the track white to minimize heat absorption they've been able to maintain ice track temperatures and reduce the energy demand on the refrigeration system. VANOC targeted LEED "Silver" green building certification for the centre.

The only thing I'm a bit confused about is there are 4 levels of LEED certifications (Certified, Silver, Gold, and Platinum), so why are all the venues certified only at Silver and Gold levels, and not at Gold and Platinum? Fair enough that not all the already existing venues could've been improved that drastically, but the new buildings built specifically for the Olympics, if they had to build them brand-new anyways why didn't they make them Platinum certified?

is no one driving?

So I've found a few quick facts on how people are getting around in Vancouver from "The Province"...

-1.6 million a day (average ridership is 750,000 to 800,000): the number of riders on the city buses, SkyTrain, SeaBus, and West Coast Express
-250,000 a day: the number of riders on the Canada Line
-20,000 a day: the number of pedestrians across the False Creek bridges
-5,000 a day: the number of cyclists across the False Creek bridges

Approximately 35% of greenhouse gas emissions in Metro Vancouver come from transportation, so this is a good start to making a change I'd say... but is this enough though? Enough to make a difference in the long run? How many of these people whether they're from BC or Japan will still use public transit once the games are over? Well according to Dave Bracewell , Olympic transportation manager for the City of Vancouver, on Saturday they saw 20 per cent more cars downtown that the previous Saturday. So I guess people couldn't even wait a week after the games officially started.

My opinion - we're doomed.